chintha-matham

Love Jihad and targetting of religious minorities

JOHN DAYAL

Published

on

The recent outpouring of support for the “development” agenda of the Prime Minister, Mr. Narendra Modi, by several leaders of the Catholic and Protestant churches may possibly stave off the immediate attention of  the dreaded Intelligence Bureau and the Ministry of Home affairs, but it is not likely to reduce the deep and seemingly abiding
distrust the Indian political and social system has of what is popularly called the “Missionaries”. Nor will it mitigate the hate that is now erupting in India against religious minorities.
Missionaries was a term once used in the Indian subcontinent to describe clergy, religious and  social workers who came in various periods over three centuries from Italy, Spain, France, the United Kingdom and later from the United States. They set up schools and
hospitals, and mission stations, in the hills, plains and deep forests of much of the Indian land mass.
The coming of foreign, and almost entirely White, religious personnel stopped soon after World War II, but there was still a sizable number in the country at Independence. In 1993 there were just 1,923, and by 2001, it had come to just a little more than half of that, at 1,100 registered foreign missionaries in India. We have no official data for 2013-14, but estimates vary from 200 to 500, some of them Indian nationals. Most of them have lived in India for periods ranging from 20 years to 60 years.
This is far removed from the image that the Sangh Parivar, and the government, paints of a land teeming with western missionaries. But since the 1960s, it is impossible for any priest or Nun to get a “Religious Visa” to India, and many who come here on tourist visas
have to sign papers at Indian consulates that they will not indulge in any religious activity in India. Only rarely is a visa given to Tele Evangelists for “Crusades” or mass prayers.
But it will not be entirely correct to suggest  that it is just the Rashtriya Swayamsewak Sangh and its political face the Bharatiya Janata Party that oppose  mission work on grounds of ideology and relgion. The larger Indian political leadership, both in the Congress and in other parties including  those emerging from the socialist movement of Mr.  Ram Manohar Lohia  of North India have seen the community as an appendage of the  British Raj. The leader of the Freedom struggle, Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, already called a Mahatma and later formally named the Father  of the Nation,  had serious
doubts about missionaries. E. Stanley Jones, Stanley Jones in is book The Christ of the Indian Road, records an encounter with Gandhi  who he asked “though you quote the words of Christ often, why is it that you appear to so adamantly reject becoming his follower?”  Gandhi’s reply was clear: “Oh, I don’t reject your Christ. I love your Christ.
It is just that so many of you Christians are so unlike your Christ”.
Gandhi’s statement  molded the political discourse in Independent India.
The  Constitution of India  promulgated in 1950 nonetheless gave Christians the right not just to profess and practice their faith, but also to propagate it, with some law givers stressing that propagation of faith was integral to the relgion. But among the first acts of the government  was to withdraw affirmative action from untouchable groups other than those professing the Hindu faith. The issue has agitated the community ever since.
The absolute ban on freedom of faith of  this 16 to 20 per cent of the population was ostensibly to prevent their walking into Christianity, or rarely, into Islam.
The bane of the Christian community has been the anti-conversion laws, ironically called Freedom of Relgion Acts which brought the State firmly into a process that was otherwise between a  person and his conscience.  Six states have these laws on board, another has enacted but not yet implemented it.  The BJP  has said  in its election
campaign it intends to make this a national law. Governmental permissions and severe penalties  are the cutting edge of these laws.
Political parties, barring perhaps the Marxists, and even the Supreme Court of India  tend to agree to the need to the anti conversion laws.
The United nations Human Rights Council, European Union and international freedom of faith organisations have called them a grave violation of the UN Charter on fundamental human rights.
The premise that no one converts unless he is being lured, cheated or coerced  into Christianity – or Islam – is now a major political slogan in the Bharatiya Janata party’s  mission to control every regional government after coming to power in New Delhi in May 2014.
And it si targetted as much against Muslims and it is against the Christian community.
The Muslim community has been the object of suspicion after the Partition of India in 1947, which  saw unprecedented violence, that has left an unspoken but virulent Islamaphobia in Indian society. The recent acts of terror in India have deepened this chasm between the communities.

This officially sanctioned suspicion, and from it the political hate, underpins the current campaigns by the Rashtriya Swayamsewak Sangh and its subsidiaries which target both the Christian and the Muslim communities, specially in north and Central India.

A new dimension has been  added this year in the electoral rhetoric of the BJP in its very successful run up to the General elections earlier this year, and elections to the legislative assemblies of several states  in north and west India. This is a campaign to  evoke   fears
in the highly patriarchal feudal societies in rural India that the security and sexual purity of their women is being threatened by young Muslim and Christian men.

It began innocently enough in Kerala with the state High court asking the police of there was a design in several cases of inter community marriages, in which the men were almost always  Muslim. The police could not find any design and the matter seemed to have ended, till now when it erupted  in far away north India. But now, the police  are
on the side of  local political thugs, and both seem acting under  the patronage and protection of powerful  leaders in New Delhi.
Love Jihad, as it is called, has been presented as a grand design in which Hindu young women are seduced by Muslim in Christian men, lured into marriage, and the converted in a conspiracy to alter the demographic profile of “Hindu” India.
The result has been the hounding of  young men, and the  humiliation of young Hindu women in areas as distant from each as Meerut in Uttar Pradesh and Bhopal in Madhya Pradesh. In Madhya Pradesh, the district police chief “annulled” the marriage of a Christian man and a Hindu woman under pressure of a Hindutva mob.
The governments of the states, and more than that, the federal government in New Delhi headed by the Prime Minister, Mr. Narendra Modi, have maintained an intriguing silence, with no official condemnation of this criminal intimidation of young couples in love.
This has led civil society groups to believe that the hate campaign has the  blessings of  the ruling dispensation in the country. The inaction of the superior courts and the national Human Rights commissions in failing to take cognisance  of these extra-judicial intrusions into the personal life of citizens compounds  the crisis.
John Dayal
www.johndayal.com

Facebook Comments

Leave a Reply


മലയാളത്തില്‍ ടൈപ്പ് ചെയ്യാന്‍ ഇവിടെ ക്ലിക്ക് ചെയ്യുക

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

അസഭ്യവും നിയമവിരുദ്ധവും അപകീര്‍ത്തികരവുമായ പരാമര്‍ശങ്ങള്‍ പാടില്ല. വ്യക്തിപരമായ അധിക്ഷേപങ്ങളും ഉണ്ടാവരുത്. അവ സൈബര്‍ നിയമപ്രകാരം കുറ്റകരമാണ്. അഭിപ്രായങ്ങള്‍ എഴുതുന്നയാളുടേത് മാത്രമാണ്. ഇ-മലയാളിയുടേതല്ല

RELATED ARTICLES

ഐഎസില്‍ ചേരാനായി ഇന്ത്യ വിട്ട നാല് മലയാളികള്‍ കൂടി കൊല്ലപ്പെട്ടു

സത്യജ്വാല July, 2017

ഇടവകയിലെ പത്ത് കുടുംബങ്ങള്‍ക്കെങ്കിലും ശൗചാലയം നിര്‍മ്മിച്ചുനല്‍കാതെ പുതിയ പള്ളിമേടയില്‍ താമസിക്കില്ലെന്ന് ഒരു വൈദികന്‍

റോക്ക് ലാന്‍ഡ് സെന്റ് മേരീസില്‍ ഫാ. ജോസ് മുളങ്ങാട്ടില്‍ നയിക്കുന്ന ധ്യാനം 7,8,9 തീയതികളില്‍

സത്യജ്വാല December 2015

Women’s ordination, moot question, what? reason or sentiment?

Laity Voice, October 2015

സത്യജ്വാല ജൂലൈ ലക്കം: കത്തോലിക്ക സഭയെ നന്നാക്കാന്‍ ഒട്ടേറെ ലേഖനങ്ങള്‍

Laity Voice-July

Synod: No Indian Bishop responds to Papal Call?

സത്യജ്വാല-ജൂണ്‍, 2015

Laity Voice-June

Church or mammon of iniquity worshp? reactions

Laity Voice-May

Who destroys Indian Christian families? Peddlers of pure blood: deadly virus

വംശഹത്യാ പരാമര്‍ശം: വത്തിക്കാന്റെ വെബ്‌സൈറ്റ് ഹാക്ക് ചെയ്തു

Laity Voice-April

കാലാവധിക്കു മുമ്പേ സ്ഥാനത്യാഗം ചെയ്യാനുള്ള സാധ്യത തള്ളിക്കളയാനാവില്ല: പാപ്പാ ഫ്രാന്‍സീസ്‌

ലെയിറ്റി വോയിസ്-March

Missionaries of Charity says RSS chief misinformed

സഭ കല്‍പിച്ചതും മോദി ഇച്ഛിച്ചതും ഒന്ന്

ഇഗ്‌നാത്തിയോസ് അഫ്രേം ദ്വിതീയന്‍ പാത്രിയര്‍ക്കീസ് ബാവയുമായി സിബിസിഐ ലെയ്റ്റി കമ്മീഷന്‍ ചെയര്‍മാന്‍ മാത്യു അറയ്ക്കല്‍ കൂടിക്കാഴ്ച നടത്തി

വിശ്വാസ തര്‍ക്കങ്ങള്‍ക്ക് കോടതികളിലൂടെ പരിഹാരം ഉണ്ടാകില്ല

NY Times editorial continues pattern of disparaging Hindus: HAF

French Muslims seek positive image post Paris attacks

Hindus in Malaysia slam cleric's views on garlanding PM

Pope Opines On Spanking

ലെയിറ്റി വോയിസ്-ഫെബ്രുവരി ലക്കം

What was Gandhi’s Evaluation of RSS?

വിവേകത്തിന്‍െറ ശബ്ദം

View More