Save Hinduism from its saviours

Kiran Nagarkar




Aleph Book Company recently caved in to the threats of a group of Hindu fanatics, abandoned one of their most prestigious authors — Wendy Doniger — and withdrew her book — On Hinduism — from circulation. The author's humiliation did not stop there. A year after the book's publication, they decided to appoint a committee of lawyers and 'four independent writers and scholars to assess the merits of the work'. 

If such an assessment was necessary, it should have been done prior to publication. And this is not a book of scientific formulas or math equations that can be proved right or wrong, true or false. What one is dealing with in a book like On Hinduism is a philosophical and historical exploration of the origins of a religion, the symbolic significance of gods and goddesses, the accretions of mythology over millennia and their interpretation. 

Readers can agree or disagree with some or all of the views and theses in this text; you can argue, debate and vigorously point out the flaws in it. But to withdraw it and then to claim that a committee will opine on the validity of speculations and theories in the book, and 'discuss with the author and the complainant in order to find a solution that satisfies all parties', is not only to miss the point of the book but to indulge in chicanery and equivocation of an order that is hard to beat. 

Time and again an outdated law is cited as the reason why publishers are easy pushovers. There's no gainsaying the obsolescence of that law and the way it plays into the hands of fanatics. But, as Saurav Datta points out in a powerful article, the law is one thing and its contextual interpretation a totally different kettle of fish. 

We can take heart that all is not lost. Indeed while there are some notable cases where courts have banned books, there are also many other instances where courts and their judgments have kept the flame of freedom of expression burning bright. 

Censorship has become a competitive business in our country. A minority in each religious community vies with other faiths to show it has the clout to force Parliament and government to bow to its wishes. 

Dalits managed to scrap cartoons incorporated in school books from Shankar's Weekly which had made an acerbic comment on the time it was taking B R Ambedkar and his team to put together the Constitution. Rajiv Gandhi went out of his way to ban Satanic Verses, in the hope that he would please the Muslim vote bank. Good Christians took umbrage at film versions of The Da Vinci Code and The Last Temptation of Christ. 

But in many ways the majority community are the worst offenders because they are the most un-Hindu of Hindus. They are ignorant of the extra-ordinary openness and inclusiveness of Hinduism. Hinduism of yore did not feel threatened. Jews, Parsis, the Portuguese were all made to feel welcome when they landed on our shores and were allowed to practise their religion. 

Dinanath Batra should have remembered one of our oldest traditions. Since time immemorial we did not persecute or ostracise people with a different religion or point of view. What we did was resolve any controversial, metaphysical differences with debates open to all and sundry. 

The most famous of these was the great Advait scholar and ascetic Adi Shankaracharya's face-to-face debate with Mandana Misra of the Mimamsa school of Buddhist ritualistic philosophy. Imagine, what a fine democratic tradition we have had for millennia when nobody had heard of a fundamental right called freedom of expression. No anger, no false accusations, no cheap power play, no banning of texts and no persecution for following different schools of belief. Just breathing the bracing air of tolerance. 

Penguin, Aleph and Rupa seem unaware of the implications of the times in which we live. Coronation of Narendra Modi is round the corner. He was a member of RSS from his youth and shares the same ideology as Batra. But quite apart from that, some of the things that have come to light about Modi are troubling to say the least. 
I'm not referring to the role of Modi's government in the 2002 Gujarat riots but the 24x7 illegal tapping of phones, the machinery of the state being dragooned to snoop on the activities of a lady in Ahmedabad, and the censoring of this matter till recently. When she moved to Bangalore, Gujarat authorities allegedly asked Karnataka's government about interstate tapping of the lady's phone, another thing the law forbids. At no point has Modi or his man Friday denied doing all these dubious things. 

It would be harmful to India's polity and to the quality of our intellectual life if our apathy does not permit us to see the writing on the wall. Many commentators have remarked that even BJP should beware Modi. He's not merely a polarising entity; he likes to have his way at any cost. All of us must perforce take a stand now and make the new government realise, never mind of which hue it is, that we will resist censorship as much as any autocratic moves.

The writer is a novelist and playwright. 

Facebook Comments

Leave a Reply

മലയാളത്തില്‍ ടൈപ്പ് ചെയ്യാന്‍ ഇവിടെ ക്ലിക്ക് ചെയ്യുക

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

അസഭ്യവും നിയമവിരുദ്ധവും അപകീര്‍ത്തികരവുമായ പരാമര്‍ശങ്ങള്‍ പാടില്ല. വ്യക്തിപരമായ അധിക്ഷേപങ്ങളും ഉണ്ടാവരുത്. അവ സൈബര്‍ നിയമപ്രകാരം കുറ്റകരമാണ്. അഭിപ്രായങ്ങള്‍ എഴുതുന്നയാളുടേത് മാത്രമാണ്. ഇ-മലയാളിയുടേതല്ല


ഐഎസില്‍ ചേരാനായി ഇന്ത്യ വിട്ട നാല് മലയാളികള്‍ കൂടി കൊല്ലപ്പെട്ടു

സത്യജ്വാല July, 2017

ഇടവകയിലെ പത്ത് കുടുംബങ്ങള്‍ക്കെങ്കിലും ശൗചാലയം നിര്‍മ്മിച്ചുനല്‍കാതെ പുതിയ പള്ളിമേടയില്‍ താമസിക്കില്ലെന്ന് ഒരു വൈദികന്‍

റോക്ക് ലാന്‍ഡ് സെന്റ് മേരീസില്‍ ഫാ. ജോസ് മുളങ്ങാട്ടില്‍ നയിക്കുന്ന ധ്യാനം 7,8,9 തീയതികളില്‍

സത്യജ്വാല December 2015

Women’s ordination, moot question, what? reason or sentiment?

Laity Voice, October 2015

സത്യജ്വാല ജൂലൈ ലക്കം: കത്തോലിക്ക സഭയെ നന്നാക്കാന്‍ ഒട്ടേറെ ലേഖനങ്ങള്‍

Laity Voice-July

Synod: No Indian Bishop responds to Papal Call?

സത്യജ്വാല-ജൂണ്‍, 2015

Laity Voice-June

Church or mammon of iniquity worshp? reactions

Laity Voice-May

Who destroys Indian Christian families? Peddlers of pure blood: deadly virus

വംശഹത്യാ പരാമര്‍ശം: വത്തിക്കാന്റെ വെബ്‌സൈറ്റ് ഹാക്ക് ചെയ്തു

Laity Voice-April

കാലാവധിക്കു മുമ്പേ സ്ഥാനത്യാഗം ചെയ്യാനുള്ള സാധ്യത തള്ളിക്കളയാനാവില്ല: പാപ്പാ ഫ്രാന്‍സീസ്‌

ലെയിറ്റി വോയിസ്-March

Missionaries of Charity says RSS chief misinformed

സഭ കല്‍പിച്ചതും മോദി ഇച്ഛിച്ചതും ഒന്ന്

ഇഗ്‌നാത്തിയോസ് അഫ്രേം ദ്വിതീയന്‍ പാത്രിയര്‍ക്കീസ് ബാവയുമായി സിബിസിഐ ലെയ്റ്റി കമ്മീഷന്‍ ചെയര്‍മാന്‍ മാത്യു അറയ്ക്കല്‍ കൂടിക്കാഴ്ച നടത്തി

വിശ്വാസ തര്‍ക്കങ്ങള്‍ക്ക് കോടതികളിലൂടെ പരിഹാരം ഉണ്ടാകില്ല

NY Times editorial continues pattern of disparaging Hindus: HAF

French Muslims seek positive image post Paris attacks

Hindus in Malaysia slam cleric's views on garlanding PM

Pope Opines On Spanking

ലെയിറ്റി വോയിസ്-ഫെബ്രുവരി ലക്കം

What was Gandhi’s Evaluation of RSS?

വിവേകത്തിന്‍െറ ശബ്ദം

View More