Why Muslims think ISLAM is Great......Learning from Followers of Muslim Religion...My Discussion with 379 Muslims---.HINDUS should learn

From: LightofTruth OM  - returntovedasom@gmail.com;

NOTE--Hindus, Western, and Macaulay Kids refer to English Educated Hindus...

Once I met a team of Muslims from USA, they were around 379 in number and I was invited in one of their function. After function we had gathering where I was asked to speak few words on Vedic religion, after listening about Vedas our Muslim brothers were amazed to find the Truth.

Suddenly one of the good soul got up and asked me question,"Acharya Ji why Hindus do not help their own people “I replied, ' Hindus do lot of charity and you can see that...He laughed and said ‘How’?

I was able to understand why he asked this question and I took the opportunity myself to explain our shortcomings which I would like to share with group.

Hindus especially English educated are one of the main reasons of making this nation poor. Question arises How???/. Don’t be angry and read further...

"Hindus consider themselves as keeper of ancient dharma which devised Yoga, Ayurveda, some great science so and so etc etc.Meet any western educated Hindu and they will explain you everything.They consider themselves most spiritual. Always forcing that only Hinduism teaches peace and love and no other religion.

Hindus are too good in self praise and lack introspection. I was amazed to see that out of so many Muslims not even single person purchased meat from western shop; they all used to buy from shops where meat either comes from Arabia or from some Islamic country. Even dress which they wear come from Islamic nations. Reason are simple, Muslim brothers say they have ample amount of money but money is of no use if they cannot serve their own people.

They buy goods from their own nation even though Quality is not good. It does not matter that some of the sweaters which they were wearing had some roughness on surface. Finally they feel proud that although sweater does not look good or is rough but money goes to Islam and its people. With that money they provided job to other Muslims and thus none of the Muslim will beg, they all will be employed. To my surprise not even single Muslim was wearing branded cloth.

This was concept of Swadeshi which Muslim deploys wherever they live. They have created a cycle where they buy only from their own people which in turn make people proud and rich right from top to bottom. Although still poverty exists in them but yet they support each other very well.

Now coming to Hindus...we see so many NGOs cry,ekal vidalya, so and so Hindu kid foundation being supported by Indians in western countries.These Hindus donate money to these organization and feel very proud that they are doing good karma but in turn they do not see that people of India do not require money they need job.Imagine if each western educated person start buying khadi or village made cloth then villager can himself provide education,schooling,medical to their kids.No one will require charity from Macaulay kids.

Hindus are special breed as they want to fight for Hinduism without knowing what Hinduism is, they want to help Hindus without developing indigenous industries and sacrificing their enjoyment, they want to develop India by using IT, Automation without knowing that automation results into less and less job and India need more hands to put at work like China not automation. Hindus want good roads and great cars and good homes knowing that most of the 80% Hindus in India do not have housing to live.

Very special breed of Hindus lives outside India who wants to help India and revive Hinduism but when Question comes of moving back to Nation....Complete Silence...They are more of nuisance.

History of India shows that it is not MUSLIMS only who are responsible for demise of this nation, great role has been played by so called Macaulay kids who are "Indian by body and by blood they are pure Englishmen”, Hindu is such a great breed that they feel bad if any Indian saint develop industry for growth of villages. They call it Business without knowing that not even single Saint in History of this nation had Ashram less than 10 acres and cows less than 300 and lot of gold, diamond etc but was used for upliftment of society...right from Rishi Bharadwaj, Gautam. Kanad, Jamini, Valmiki, Vashisth or any rishi, Bhagwaan Buddha who was the richest of all...they all had lot of property. But Macaulay kids have devised a special definition of Hinduism in their mind which is

"All rishis were poor people and they used to live by begging, they are not authorized to have property. They are kind of street dogs who should survive on bait provided by western people...Idols which is made of stone would be worshiped but any sage or saint who teaches/Preaches about God should not be worshiped . IDOL made of stone has life although it was broken million of times by ISLAM and daily Dog will urinate on idols and birds put waste on idols which so called GOD cannot clean. But still we worship the stones and criticize the messengers of GOD in human form...

These western Hindus cannot see their own brothers or sisters doing good and from heart they are jealous of seeing their own people doing good, very special breed of Hindus...we will not do but will not allow anyone to do....

Another great breed is of people who own temples...this is really very special breed...they want people to come to temple without knowing that Dharam is not inside Temple it has to be outside Temple.....Modern temples are great Picnic spots...

Macaulay kids really feel proud after donating money for poor kids and feel proud in buying MNC Product. They can but ATTA (FLOUR) costing 100Rs/kg from MNC but buying from Indian shop for 40RS? Kg means below standard.

If one LAUKI or vegetable is bad and someone dies they will market it like anything but when by using one western medicine million people die they call it science will take care...What a breed...

Macaulay kids feel proud of teaching people in India that we should follow our culture; we should teach our kids about our culture, we should die for our culture.

Ask anyone from ISLAM that we want to do something for ISLAM...100hands will be with you, but ask any Hindu, they will be first to become road block...

Ask for donation for propagating ISLAM and you can collect 1Cr in few hrs...Ask Hindu same...they will be silent....

But ask them one Question "WHY Don't YOU TEACH YOUR KIDS SAME AND ASK THEM TO WORK IN REMOTE AREAS OF THIS NATION"

Ask them "WHY YOUR KIDS DO NOT LISTEN TO YOUR ADVICE'

Answer is "THEY ARE INDEPENDENT NOW"

Reality is kids no more listen to Parents.....

COMPLETE SILENCE........

--
Jai Bharat
Acharya Agnivrat, www.agniveer.com, www.satyavidya.com, http://satyagni.com, www.vjsingh.com
"ॐ भूर्भुवः स्वः तत्सवितुर्वरेण्यम् भर्गो देवस्य धीमहि धियो यो नः प्रचोदयात्"

With English would also come English culture traditions, way of dressing, and way of eating, English Goods?

Like western people Bhaaratiya people has also adopted junk food from Mc Donald, Kentucky Fried Chicken, Donut and many tea and coffee, Pepsi cola,   Coca cola. Bhaaratiya people has also adopted Live in System like in western countries have also started marrying same sex people thus destroying the traditional family system.

Even for celebrating birth days, Western system is adopted. In western system candles are stuck in cakes and then with singing of Birth day to you, candles are blown to extinguish the burning candles, as if peoples are wishing to extinguish the life of person whose birth day is being celebrated. In Hindu system divas or earthen lamps are lit with oil and some religious puja is conducted. These divas are kept lit for a long time.  No body blows to extinguish the divas. These divas extinguish of its own when diva runs out of oil.

Hindi movies not only give cast in English but also now a day’s name of most of the movies in English. Even in many Hindi movies more English is spoken rather than Hindi.

On Sign boards and on billboards, on wrapping materials, on the labels of commercial products usually English is written.

Mostly business is conducted in Bhaarat in English, therefore it is very difficult to get job in Bhaarat if one does not know English.

Secularism in the sarkar!

You see, whether Muslim (eg, Wajahat Habibullah) or Christian, they have no qualms about openly in their professional capacity advocating the interests of their religion ("minorities").

Can a Hindu do that?

http://www.mangaloretoday.com/mt/index.php?action=mn&type=4497

(his is a Catholic –

 http://konkanicatholics.blogspot.in/2007/08/christy-fernandez-appointed-presidents.html

__._,_.___

'Macaulay, not the traditional acharyas, created India's brown sahibs' Dr. Vijaya Rajiva

http://bharatkalyan97.blogspot.in/2012/02/macaulay-not-traditional-acharyas.html

The video of author and writer Rajiv Malhotra's talk in Bangalore ' Identifying the Elements of Heritage of Development in India' at The Institute of Social and Economic Change, Feb. 24,2012) shows a continuation of his agenda against Hinduism's traditional acharyas, whom he has castigated previously and now once again for not studying Western and non Hindu thought. At this talk (during the question and answer period) he goes a step further and claims that it is the traditional acharyas who created India's brown sahibs by nor providing a critique of western thought! His reasoning went thus: why did they not study and refute a Hegel or a Kant? It is this lapse that has created the present generation of brown sahibs alienated from their Hindu roots, so he pronounced.

This statement from someone who is relatively well informed is surprising. By now, most educated Indians are aware that it is Lord Macaulay's minutes of 1835 that turned Hindu education on its head and imposed British education on India. Since then colonised Indians have become the last of the Englishmen in their mental makeup and even in their lifestyles. Why then does Malhotra a seemingly well read and well informed Hindu from the diaspora repeat this misinformation during the question and answer hour following the talk?

The present writer has pointed out in previous articles that there is a threefold agenda that has characterised Shri Malhotra's trajectory in the last few years:

(1) the astonishing defence of Nityananda,

(2) the u turn to interfaith dialogue,

(3) the usurpation of the role of the traditional acharyas of Hinduism.

While number one has been quietly (hopefully) shelved, Mr. Malhotra persists with numbers 2 & 3. The present writer believes that there are three reasons for this. First, Mr. Malhotra is an autodidact and therefore is overwhelmed by his own achievements (a frequent weakness of some autodidacts, though not all). Hence, he has not fully understood that there are several scholars in India who are currently doing excellent work in the topics that Mr. Malhotra has mentioned in the talk in Bangalore. It is the political situation that prevents any action being taken to incorporate their suggestions in the educational curriculum. Equally, he seems unaware that the traditional acharyas are doing an excellent job of expounding the traditional knowledge of the Hindu scriptures. Distracting them from this serious task in order that they may read a Hegel or Kant is the most absurd suggestion any thinking Hindu can make.

That work of reading Hegel and Kant and rebutting their arguments should be undertaken by academics, scholars, free lancers like Malhotra, not the traditional acharyas who have been the backbone of Hindu civilisation since time immemorial and will continue to be so. They must be left alone to continue their work. Wisely, many of them who have been approached by Malhotra, have rejected him. And well they should!

The second reason is that Shri Malhotra is not fully focussed on whatever task he has taken upon himself (and this task is not yet clear). A variety of topics are listed at the speech: environment, reclaiming India's originality in the sciences, sustainable development, studying and reacting to non Hindu thought etc.

In other words, his reach has exceeded his grasp and the one liners and pronouncements are not based on a solid consistent line of thinking. The turbulence is all too evident. First, there is the publication of Breaking India, where he and his co author Aravindan Neelkandan detailed the dangers facing Indian amongst which is the Inculturation from the Christian Church. Then he speaks of devoting his life to Hindu Christian dialogue with the self same malafide sources(the Huffington Post blog), an INTERNAL CONTRADICTION in his thinking (about which the present writer has previously written)And now he is into various other projects which are not linked by a consistent vision.

By contrast, the acharyas know what they are doing. Take for instance the example of the Kerala Nambudiris who have maintained the Vedic traditions over several centuries with due diligence and devotion. They have not attempted to engage in any interfaith dialogue or travel abroad. Hindus owe it to them for the preservation of the ancient Vedic culture and traditions The recent death of scholar Fritz Stahl(who videographed the Athirathram ritual) has highlighted the performance in 2011 of the Athirathram, undertaken with scrupulous attention to every minutiae of the Fire Ritual from Vedic times. It has been noted that since the rise of Buddhism in India, many parts of India abandoned the Athirathram. Only the Kerala Nambudiris preserved this invaluable heritage. Hence, the Hindu Samaj must be extremely cautious in Malhotra's various prescriptions for what he sees are the limitations of the acharya tradition. Indeed, it is questionable whether his advice will even benefit the modern youth of India. Is this another version of FDI in retail ? One cannot lecture the youth to return to their heritage, even while hitting out at one of the pillars of the Hindu heritage .

The third reason is Shri Malhotra's blithe rejection of 'politics', especially the politics of interfaith dialogue. He is deeply mired in the 'politics' of his own rejection of politics. Many writers have pointed out that the interfaith dialogue as it stands, is a fraudulent process. It is the Church's most recent method of duping unsuspecting Hindus. Unless and until Hindus set the terms of the discussion/dialogue, they appear as guests at various such occasions and are persuaded to accept the host's point of view. And therefore until the proper conditions are met, the politics of interfaith dialogue will obstruct Hindus.

Is there a second front against Dharma being pursued by enthusiasts and their camp followers, to weaken and ultimately defeat the pillars of Hindu tradition of whom the traditional acharyas are an important pillar? The Hindu Samaj must be alert to such a possibility.

(The writer is a Political Philosopher who taught at a Canadian universtiy. Her academic training is in Philosophy, Political Science, Literature, Political Economy & History).

Listen how Jawahar Lal Nehru closed all Sanskrit Schools just after independence

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mN2iQOZ33BA&feature=related