Dear Editor,

This is the third time I am commenting on this article hoping that in your goodness you will publish it. Even the person counterfeiting my name gets published, but it is a pity that only people who are in the inner circle gets their opinions published without fail. In order to enlarge the view of the reading public, please include all the coments that come your way unless it is legally offensive.

All I want to say is: Christian institutions paved a way for the upliftment of the so-called "lower caste". The discrimination practice/ed by the so-called Christain "higher caste" are by far, was much less than that of the Hindu upper caste. For example, an 'avarnan' could enter the church for worship whereas he/she was (in olden times) summarily banned from entering anywhere near the temple. 

A true Christian cannot discriminate against a fellow human being. He takes after the example from Jesus Christ, who deliberately told the parable of 'Good Samritan' and also asked for a drink from the 'Samaritan woman' at the well.

Race is like flowers. All that the Crator needs is that all of them should keep its human fragrance of love!

“Chaos at Trump rally” (CNN)- This is a preview of his government if he is elected.

·         Several protesters   were demonstrating against Trump's rhetoric on illegal immigration. Some were seen carrying Mexican flags as they marched in the street. Other demonstrators shouted insults and slurs at police officers.

·         Rojelio Banuelos, a 26-year-old student, carried a sign that read, "Liberation not deportation."

·         "I'm against Trump's nativist and nationalistic agenda, which divides people and is very hateful of the other," he said.

·         While Banuelos simply marched through the streets, he called the property damage and anger some demonstrators expressed Friday night "the symptom of hate speech" and said he did not believe any individuals were taking advantage of the protest.

·         Katie Brazer, a 26-year-old community organizer who marched alongside Banuelos, agreed.

·         "I think people are tired of these messages of hate," she said.

FFA (Freedom For All)

Republicans are a confused lot.  
Historically, it is their turn to preside over the country. 
The unprecedented voter turnout in the Republican primary, if maintained, will favorably tilt the balance in the so-called swing states. 
However, they are unable to choose a good candidate from 1/17. 
Most of the republicans do not like Trump.  The last-minute scrambling to buttress a weak candidate like Trump is a distress action which explains the >60% recent support.  I take pity for them.  Let’s see how far “the necessary evil” argument will go!

On the other hand, democrats have competent candidates.  Bernie may be old of the lot, but sufficiently young, hot and sexy to be a rallying point for youngsters.  Now that he is slowly accepting the receding prospects, Hillary has to woo Bernie.  Otherwise millions of disenchanted first-time-voter democrats will abstain on that crucial November Tuesday.  Hillary’s main weakness is the argument that she wants to continue Obama’s policies.  There are millions of disenchanted independents and others who may be repelled from her.  Having the 42^nd president by her side may be a strong point, who knows? Al Gore kept a safe distance from him and lost in 2000.  The so-called “woman-card” and “black-card” that Hillary is said to have been playing are two-edged swords.  A good proportion of male-chauvinists may become angry and cross-vote, and white voters may become disillusioned.  However, there is a racial divide in the democrat’s primary voting pattern:  Bernie won many demographically-strong white states, and vice-versa.   Obama won the whitish Iowa caucus in 2008, not because he was a black, but because he was the best!   If the Blacks, Hispanics and minorities turn out in large numbers, Hillary still has a chance to be the 45^th president.